LD340 creates the “Maine Speedy Trial Act,” setting strict deadlines for when criminal trials must begin after arraignment, with shorter timelines phased in over several years depending on the severity of the charge. Certain delays—such as mental-health evaluations, defendant-requested continuances, or codefendant issues—do not count toward the time limit. Courts may extend deadlines only for good cause. If a trial does not begin on time, the court must dismiss the case, either with or without prejudice, after considering factors such as the seriousness of the offense and victims input. Victims must be notified of hearings on dismissal motions and may address the court.
The Maine State House of Representatives passed LD340 on June 13, 2025 by a vote of 77 to 69. We have assigned pluses to the ayes because nothing should interfere with the Bill of Rights and, in this case, the Sixth Amendment guarantee that “the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.” Elected representatives should fully embrace constitutional principles in every situation. Despite concerns about staffing, resources, and potential miscarriages of justice, none of these challenges justify infringing upon an individual’s constitutionally protected rights. For these same reasons, longer delays also increase the risk of miscarriages of justice, undermine public trust, and ultimately harm both victims and the accused. The Constitution is the solution.
